From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Assocs. Asset Recovery, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Feb 13, 2018
Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-124-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-124-CMC

02-13-2018

Maurice Wyman Scott, Plaintiff, v. Associates Asset Recovery, LLC, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Complaint alleging Defendant converted his property negligently. ECF No. 1. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 (B)(2)€, D.S.C., this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges for pre-trial proceedings and a Report and Recommendation ("Report") on dispositive issues. On January 24, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that this matter be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. ECF No. 10. The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of the procedures and requirements for filing objections to the Report and the serious consequences if he failed to do so. Plaintiff has not filed objections and the time for doing so has passed.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with the court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of any portion of the Report of the Magistrate Judge to which a specific objection is made. The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation made by the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

After reviewing the record of this matter, the applicable law, and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the court agrees with the conclusion of the Report that this matter should be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as Plaintiff has failed to allege facts showing diversity jurisdiction exists. Accordingly, the court adopts and incorporates the Report and Recommendation by reference in this Order. This matter is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Cameron McGowan Currie

CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE

Senior United States District Judge Columbia, South Carolina
February 13, 2018


Summaries of

Scott v. Assocs. Asset Recovery, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Feb 13, 2018
Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-124-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Scott v. Assocs. Asset Recovery, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Maurice Wyman Scott, Plaintiff, v. Associates Asset Recovery, LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 13, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-124-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2018)