From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sciortino v. Dimon Steamship Corporation

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 3, 1930
44 F.2d 1019 (2d Cir. 1930)

Summary

In Sciortino v. Dimon S.S. Corporation, 2 Cir., 44 F.2d 1019, affirming D.C., 39 F.2d 210, we held that an employee who accepted compensation thereby lost his right to sue third parties.

Summary of this case from Toomey v. Waterman S.S. Corporation

Opinion

No. 42.

November 3, 1930.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

David M. Fink and Jacquin Frank, both of New York City, for appellant.

Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark Hupper, of New York City (Wm. Paul Allen and G.H. Merritt, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


Judgment [ 39 F.2d 210] affirmed.


Summaries of

Sciortino v. Dimon Steamship Corporation

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 3, 1930
44 F.2d 1019 (2d Cir. 1930)

In Sciortino v. Dimon S.S. Corporation, 2 Cir., 44 F.2d 1019, affirming D.C., 39 F.2d 210, we held that an employee who accepted compensation thereby lost his right to sue third parties.

Summary of this case from Toomey v. Waterman S.S. Corporation
Case details for

Sciortino v. Dimon Steamship Corporation

Case Details

Full title:Saverio SCIORTINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIMON STEAMSHIP CORPORATION…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 1930

Citations

44 F.2d 1019 (2d Cir. 1930)

Citing Cases

Toomey v. Waterman S.S. Corporation

But irrespective of whether there was proof of a conscious exercise of the election given by Section 933(a)…

The Owen

Claimant, therefore, contends that libellant's claim has been assigned by operation of law to Murphy-Cook…