From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sciacca v. Caruso

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Feb 11, 2000
754 A.2d 102 (R.I. 2000)

Opinion

No. 99-444-A.

February 11, 2000.

Joseph A. Sciacca, Cranston.

Robert S. Ciresi, North Providence, John M. Verdecchia, Cranston.


ORDER

The plaintiffs, Anthony Sciacca, Richard Loffredo, Silvio Mollicone, and Ernest Berube, have appealed from an order of the Superior Court denying their appeal from a decision of the Johnston zoning board of review. Review of such a zoning board decision may only be secured by petition for common law writ of certiorari. See, e.g. Gabriele v. Rocchio, 665 A.2d 566, 566 (R.I. 1995) (per curiam); Blackstone Park Improvement Ass'n v. State, 448 A.2d 1233, 1241 n. 6 (R.I. 1982); Bassi v. Zoning Board of Review of Providence, 107 R.I. 702, 705-06, 271 A.2d 210 (1970).

Accordingly, the plaintiffs' appeal is denied and dismissed as procedurally improper.


Summaries of

Sciacca v. Caruso

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Feb 11, 2000
754 A.2d 102 (R.I. 2000)
Case details for

Sciacca v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SCIACCA ET AL. v. GLORIA CARUSO ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Feb 11, 2000

Citations

754 A.2d 102 (R.I. 2000)

Citing Cases

Northern Trust v. Zoning Board of Review

We have made it abundantly clear that "[t]he proper procedure to review a judgment of the Superior Court on…

LISCHIO v. ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW, WC/00-194 (2001)

The Board's decision denying the Appellants a dimensional variance for "Lot 20" is supported by the…