From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Rehfuss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1910
92 N.E. 1101 (N.Y. 1910)

Opinion

Argued April 4, 1910

Decided April 26, 1910

C.W. Wilson, Jr., for appellant.

Ferd. W. Buermeyer and Hugo Hirsh for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Dissenting, on the authority of Stokes v. Weston ( 142 N.Y. 433) and Matter of Tompkins ( 154 N.Y. 634): EDWARD T. BARTLETT, J.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Rehfuss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1910
92 N.E. 1101 (N.Y. 1910)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Rehfuss

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v . JACOB H. REHFUSS, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 26, 1910

Citations

92 N.E. 1101 (N.Y. 1910)
92 N.E. 1101