From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Parker

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 24, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 951 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

March 24, 1959

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, FRED C. MORITT, J.

Abraham Freundlich for appellant.

Parisi Louison ( Norman Nosoff of counsel), for respondent.


It is undisputed that the lease for the store space in question was executed in conformity with the provisions of section 8 (subd. [gg], par. [1]) of the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.). Upon the expiration of the term, such space was removed from the possessory protection theretofore afforded by the statute (Business Rent Law, § 12, as amd. by L. 1956, ch. 735, L. 1957, ch. 452).

The final order should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $30 costs to landlord, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in the petition, with appropriate costs in the court below. Issuance of warrant stayed until May 31, 1959, upon condition that tenant pay to landlord for use and occupation the same monthly rent as heretofore, in advance.

Concur — PETTE, DI GIOVANNA and BENJAMIN, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Parker

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 24, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 951 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. BERNARD PARKER, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1959

Citations

17 Misc. 2d 951 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
192 N.Y.S.2d 473

Citing Cases

Boston v. Nielsen

Naturally there was no agreement for any set-off by which a balance would become the debt between the…

Turner v. Buttrick

Patron v. Quinlan, 271 Mass. 339. The second count we interpret as a claim for the compensation found to be…