From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Frito-Lay North America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2012
No. C -12-02740(EDL) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2012)

Summary

transferring case

Summary of this case from Fernandez v. Franklin Res., Inc.

Opinion

No. C -12-02740(EDL)

09-07-2012

ALYSSA SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff, v. FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

On September 7, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of this Court's statement at the hearing on September 4, 2012 that it would grant Defendant Frito-Lay's Motion to Transfer. This motion is in violation of Local Rule 7-9, which provides that "[n]o party may notice a motion for reconsideration without first obtaining leave of Court to file the motion" and sets forth the proper procedure for seeking leave to file a motion for reconsideration. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion is stricken without prejudice to refiling if Plaintiff receives leave of Court after complying with the rule. Defendants need not respond to this motion and the hearing noticed for October 16, 2012 is vacated. Rather, the Court is issuing a written order setting forth its reasoning. Plaintiff must comply with Local Rule 7-9 and properly seek leave to file a motion for reconsideration before the Court will consider any such request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Frito-Lay North America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2012
No. C -12-02740(EDL) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2012)

transferring case

Summary of this case from Fernandez v. Franklin Res., Inc.
Case details for

Schwartz v. Frito-Lay North America

Case Details

Full title:ALYSSA SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff, v. FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 7, 2012

Citations

No. C -12-02740(EDL) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2012)

Citing Cases

Youngevity Int'l, Inc. v. Renew Life Formulas, Inc.

Courts analyze three factors to determine the applicability of the first-to-file rule: (1) the chronology of…

Sporn v. Transunion Interactive, Inc.

(See Sgouros Compl. ¶¶ 78, 81.) See also Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc., 711 F.Supp.2d 1142, 1148 (E.D.…