From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Allegheny Cnty.

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2014
No. 1769 C.D. 2013 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Jul. 2, 2014)

Opinion

No. 1769 C.D. 2013

07-02-2014

Howard Schwartz, Appellant v. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and Value-Added Communications, Inc. Value-Added Communications, Inc. v. Securus Technologies, Inc. and The County of Allegheny


ORDER

NOW, July 2, 2014, having considered appellant's application for reargument en banc, and appellees' joint answer in opposition thereto, the application is denied.

/s/_________

DAN PELLEGRINI,

President Judge


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Allegheny Cnty.

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2014
No. 1769 C.D. 2013 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Jul. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Allegheny Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Howard Schwartz, Appellant v. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and…

Court:COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

No. 1769 C.D. 2013 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Jul. 2, 2014)