Opinion
February 21, 1929.
Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District.
Abraham J. Halprin, for the appellant.
Halperin Muney, for the respondent.
It was error to exclude from evidence the chattel mortgage in suit upon the objection of defendant garage keeper that the copy served on the attorney of said defendant was not "an exact copy" of the paper offered in evidence in that the signature of the mortgagee does not appear on the copy of the chattel mortgage so served.
Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, DELEHANTY, LYDON and LEVY, JJ.