From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuver v. Lodestro

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-10-2016

Emma B. SCHUVER, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Pamela LODESTRO, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of G. Marvin Schuver, Deceased, Defendant–Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Wright, Wright and Hampton, Jamestown (Joseph M. Calimeri of Counsel), for defendant-appellant. Brautigam & Brautigam, LLP, Fredonia (Daryl P. Brautigam of Counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Stephen W. Cass, A.J.), entered May 29, 2015. The order, among other things, denied in part the motion of defendant Pamela Lodestro, individually, and as executor of the Estate of G. Marvin Schuver, to dismiss the amended complaint against her.

Wright, Wright and Hampton, Jamestown (Joseph M. Calimeri of Counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Brautigam & Brautigam, LLP, Fredonia (Daryl P. Brautigam of Counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, and TROUTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schuver v. Lodestro

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Schuver v. Lodestro

Case Details

Full title:Emma B. SCHUVER, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Pamela LODESTRO, Individually…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 1593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
144 A.D.3d 1593
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7534