From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuster v. Texasbank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Oct 9, 2003
No. 02-03-240-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2003)

Opinion

No. 02-03-240-CV.

Delivered: October 9, 2003.

Appeal from the 342nd District Court of Tarrant County.

Attorney for Appellant: Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff Miller, L.L.P. and Michael Miner, Arlington, TX.

Attorney for Appellee: Pope, Hardwicke, Christie, Et Al, and Lee F. Christie, Fort Worth, TX.

PANEL D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


We have considered the parties' "Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Schuster v. Texasbank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Oct 9, 2003
No. 02-03-240-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2003)
Case details for

Schuster v. Texasbank

Case Details

Full title:MARK SCHUSTER, Appellant v. TEXASBANK, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Oct 9, 2003

Citations

No. 02-03-240-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2003)