From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuster v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 31, 1977
551 S.W.2d 210 (Ark. 1977)

Opinion

No. CR 77-86

Opinion delivered May 31, 1977

APPEAL ERROR — REQUEST FOR BELATED APPEAL — QUESTIONS OF FACT TO BE DETERMINED, EFFECT OF. — Where there are important questions of fact to be determined before the Court can say that there was good reason for the failure of appellant or his attorney to life the record with the Court, petitioner's request for a belated appeal will be denied without prejudice to his applying to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether his right to appeal was voluntarily waived.

Motion for belated appeal; motion denied.

Stephen Schuster, pro se.

Bill Clinton, Atty. Gen., for respondent.


Petitioner was convicted of aggravated robbery in the Circuit Court of Crawford County and sentenced to 15 years in prison and fined $10,000.00. Notice of appeal was filed by petitioner's employed trial counsel on June 21, 1976. It appears that this attorney did not perfect the appeal because he received a letter from petitioner stating that appellant did not want to appeal this conviction. Petitioner in requesting that a belated appeal be allowed, contends that this waiver of his right to appeal was not voluntary because of the prosecuting attorney's threats to prosecute him on other charges, if he did appeal. The employed trial counsel has not been given permission by this court to withdraw. See Rule 36.26, Rules of Criminal Procedure; Rule 11(h), Rules of the Supreme Court. Appeal has not been dismissed, in this court, in spite of the fact that notice of appeal was given. See Rule 36.20, 36.23, Rules of Criminal Procedure; Norfleet v. Norfleet, 223 Ark. 751, 268 S.W.2d 387; State v. Adkisson, 251 Ark. 119, 471 S.W.2d 332. We can not ascertain whether the appeal was ever dismissed in the trial court.

Although we can grant a belated appeal, where notice was given and the transcript record never filed here under Rule 36.9, Rules of Criminal Procedure, there are important questions of fact to be determined before we can say that there was good reason for the failure of appellant or his attorney to file the record here, and these questions can not be resolved on affidavits.

Petitioner's request for a belated appeal is denied without prejudice to his applying to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether his right to appeal was voluntarily waived, and if not, for an order for the filing of a transcript of the record in this court, and without prejudice to his right to appeal to this court from any ruling adverse to him.

BYRD, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Schuster v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 31, 1977
551 S.W.2d 210 (Ark. 1977)
Case details for

Schuster v. State

Case Details

Full title:Stephen SCHUSTER v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: May 31, 1977

Citations

551 S.W.2d 210 (Ark. 1977)
551 S.W.2d 210

Citing Cases

Nelson v. Banks

In circumstances where identical cases between the same parties are pending in a federal court and a state…

Henderson v. State

        There are instances where it can be determined from the motion and affidavits whether the defendant…