From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuster v. Hegge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 22, 2013
3:11-cv-00081-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 22, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00081-HDM-WGC

01-22-2013

DONALD SCHUSTER, Plaintiff, v. KATHERINE HEGGE, ROBERT B. BANNISTER, DON POAG, B. EGERTON, DEBRA WILLIAMS, REBECCA RICHARDSON, and JOHN R. SCOTT, Defendants.


ORDER

The court has considered the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#67) filed on December 7, 2012, in which the magistrate judge recommends granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment (#51) and denying plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (#58). No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed and the time for filing any objections has expired. The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and the court hereby accepts and adopts the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#67).

Accordingly, the defendants' motion for summary judgment (#51) is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (#58) is DENIED. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Schuster v. Hegge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 22, 2013
3:11-cv-00081-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Schuster v. Hegge

Case Details

Full title:DONALD SCHUSTER, Plaintiff, v. KATHERINE HEGGE, ROBERT B. BANNISTER, DON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

3:11-cv-00081-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 22, 2013)