From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schussel v. New York City Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 16, 1980
417 N.E.2d 569 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued November 10, 1980

Decided December 16, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MARTIN B. STECHER, J.

Roger K. Solymosy and Steven E. Pegalis for appellants.

Kenneth Howard Schiffrin, Helen R. Cassidy, John A. Murray and Solomon Tanzer for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

There was no error of law in the unanimous determination of that court that all 22 causes of action set forth in the complaint should be dismissed. Nor was it an abuse of discretion to deny appellants leave to replead with respect to the claims alleged in the first four causes of action.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Schussel v. New York City Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 16, 1980
417 N.E.2d 569 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Schussel v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:BERT SCHUSSEL et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 16, 1980

Citations

417 N.E.2d 569 (N.Y. 1980)
417 N.E.2d 569
436 N.Y.S.2d 275

Citing Cases

MTR of Abdur-Rahim v. Housing Preserv. Dev.

The fact that the petition, unlike the complaint, does not demand monetary relief, which demand would likely…