From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schultz v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 29, 2004
No. C-03-4417 MHP (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2004)

Opinion

No. C-03-4417 MHP

April 29, 2004


ORDER


On February 23, 2004, defendant San Francisco. Bay Area Rapid Transit District filed a motion for partial summary judgment with this court. Consistent with this court's local rules, a hearing on the motion was initially set for April 5, 2004. Under Local Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff Beverly Schultz was required to file any opposition to defendant's motion at least twenty-one (21) days before the hearing — that is, by March 15, 2004. See Local R. 7-3(a) ("Any opposition to a motion must be served and filed not less than 21 days before the hearing day."). On March 17, 2004, the court reset the hearing on the motion for April 19, 2004, expressly preserving the original briefing schedule. To date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition to defendant's motion, nor has it sought an enlargement of time in which to do so. The court has already taken the motion under submission without oral argument, and the court now deems the motion unopposed. Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is thus GRANTED as unopposed,

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schultz v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 29, 2004
No. C-03-4417 MHP (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2004)
Case details for

Schultz v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Case Details

Full title:BEVERLY SCHULTZ, Plaintiff, v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 29, 2004

Citations

No. C-03-4417 MHP (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2004)