From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuette v. United States Court

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 14, 2023
23-cv-01835-JD (N.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-01835-JD

06-14-2023

CHRISTOPHER SCHUETTE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES COURT, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. No. 6

JAMES DONATO United States District Judge

Petitioner, a federal detainee acting pro se, filed a habeas petition. Petitioner was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was provided twenty-eight days to correct these deficiencies. More than twenty-eight days has passed, and petitioner has not paid the fee or filed a complete application to proceed IFP. The case is dismissed without prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied. All pending motions are dismissed as moot. Petitioner may reopen this case by submitting the filing fee or a complete application to proceed IFP. Petitioner is also advised to discuss his issues with his counsel in his criminal case U.S. v. Schuette, Case No. 22-cr-0233 BLF.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schuette v. United States Court

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 14, 2023
23-cv-01835-JD (N.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Schuette v. United States Court

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER SCHUETTE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES COURT, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 14, 2023

Citations

23-cv-01835-JD (N.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2023)