From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuette v. Purcell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 1998
962 S.W.2d 891 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72484

FILED: February 3, 1998 Rehearing Denied March 24, 1998.

APPEAL FROM MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF CAPE GIRADEAU COUNTY; HON. PETER L. STATLER, JUDGE.

Jeffrey P. Hine, Osburn, Hine, Kuntze Yates, L.L.C., 1359 Mt. Auburn Road Cape Girardeau, MO 6370, for appellant.

Tom K. O'Loughlin II, O'Loughlin, O'Loughlin McManaman, L.C., 1736 North Kingshighway Cape Girardeau, MO 63701, for respondent.

Before: Lawrence G. Crahan, P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs in an action for conversion of a horse trailer. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. No error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Schuette v. Purcell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 1998
962 S.W.2d 891 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Schuette v. Purcell

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL RUTH SCHUETTE, Plaintiffs/Respondents, vs. JOHN PURCELL…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 3, 1998

Citations

962 S.W.2d 891 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)