From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schueller v. Minney

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 17, 2003
76 F. App'x 132 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Submitted September 8, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Vaughn R. Walker, District Judge, Presiding.

Norbert A. Schueller, Belen, NM, pro se.

Wilfred T. Fong, Oakland, CA, Defendant-Appellee.


Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Norbert A. Schueller appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against three judges of the Contra Costa County Superior Court. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed on February 24, 2003.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Schueller v. Minney

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 17, 2003
76 F. App'x 132 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Schueller v. Minney

Case Details

Full title:Norbert A. SCHUELLER, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. John C. MINNEY; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 17, 2003

Citations

76 F. App'x 132 (9th Cir. 2003)