From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schriefer v. Schriefer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2001
800 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 5D01-789

November 30, 2001

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Charles P. Vaughn, Inverness, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.


This is a one issue appeal from a break-up of a two year marriage. That one issue is the reasonableness of the distribution of marital property. The distribution is both confusing and unequal and is unexplained by the judgment. We remand for the court to set forth the expenditures of marital funds by both parties (the court has listed various amounts of expenditures by the wife but we cannot determine whether such expenditures overlap or are distinct) and explain how such expenditures, if they do, justify the considerably greater distribution to the husband or, if the disparity is not due to such expenditures, advise us what the justification is. See section 61.075(3)(d), Fla. Stat.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schriefer v. Schriefer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2001
800 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Schriefer v. Schriefer

Case Details

Full title:DALE J. SCHRIEFER, Appellant, v. ROBERT J. SCHRIEFER, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 30, 2001

Citations

800 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Schriefer v. Schriefer

No Appearance for Appellee. Prior Report: 800 So.2d 699. SHARP, W.,…