From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schrader v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Apr 2, 2012
No. 3:10-cv-6287-JE (D. Or. Apr. 2, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-cv-6287-JE

04-02-2012

LARRY EUGENE SCHRADER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation (#15) on February 23, 2012, in which he recommends that this Court reverse the Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits, and remand the action to the agency for an award of benefits. .

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo. I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings & Recommendation [15]. Accordinglv. the Commissioner's decision is reversed and this action is remanded for an award of benefits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Schrader v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Apr 2, 2012
No. 3:10-cv-6287-JE (D. Or. Apr. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Schrader v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LARRY EUGENE SCHRADER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Apr 2, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-cv-6287-JE (D. Or. Apr. 2, 2012)