From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schottel v. Meyer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Dec 17, 2002
92 S.W.3d 313 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. ED 81383

December 17, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Angela D. Quigless, Judge.

James W. Schottel, Jr., Schottel Associates, P.C., St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Scott B. Meyer, Belleville, IL, pro se.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Kathianne Knaup Crane, J.



ORDER


Plaintiff, James W. Schottel, Jr., appeals from the trial court's judgment dismissing his tortious interference action for lack of personal jurisdiction. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Schottel v. Meyer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Dec 17, 2002
92 S.W.3d 313 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Schottel v. Meyer

Case Details

Full title:JAMES W. SCHOTTEL, JR., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SCOTT B. MEYER…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Dec 17, 2002

Citations

92 S.W.3d 313 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)