Summary
In Scholz, supra, neither the petition nor the proof revealed a material change in the circumstances of the parties to justify a modification and the court noted that the record seemed to reflect that the issue between the parties was a disagreement arising from their discussions and negotiations rather than the welfare of their children.
Summary of this case from Smith v. SmithOpinion
Gen. No. 10,819. (Abstract of Decision.)
July 10, 1967.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon County; the Hon. FRANK J. GOLLINGS, Judge, presiding.
Judgment affirmed.
Wilson, Dyar, Houchen and McDonald, of Decatur (Vernon H. Houchen, of counsel), for appellant.
Le Forgee, Samuels, Miller, Schroeder Jackson, of Decatur (Jerald E. Jackson and Robert W. Ohlsen, of counsel), for appellee.
Not to be published in full.