From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schoeneman v. Gamelin

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Mar 17, 2020
596 S.W.3d 226 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107940

03-17-2020

Frances G. A. SCHOENEMAN, et al., Respondents, v. Steve GAMELIN, et al., Appellants.

FOR APPELLANT, David L. Baylard, 30 S. McKinley St., Union, Mo 63084. FOR RESPONDENT, Justin E. Head, 315 East Main St., Union, MO 63084, Robert L. Davis, 168 South Service Rd. East, Sullivan, MO 63080.


FOR APPELLANT, David L. Baylard, 30 S. McKinley St., Union, Mo 63084.

FOR RESPONDENT, Justin E. Head, 315 East Main St., Union, MO 63084, Robert L. Davis, 168 South Service Rd. East, Sullivan, MO 63080.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steve Gamelin and Beth Gamelin appeal the judgment, entered after a bench trial, in favor of Frances G. A. Schoeneman, William M. Schoeneman, Sr., and Patty A. Schoeneman in a proceeding relating to the lawfulness of gates on an easement. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Schoeneman v. Gamelin

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Mar 17, 2020
596 S.W.3d 226 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Schoeneman v. Gamelin

Case Details

Full title:Frances G. A. SCHOENEMAN, et al., Respondents, v. Steve GAMELIN, et al.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Mar 17, 2020

Citations

596 S.W.3d 226 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)