From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schoen v. Scudder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 16, 1976
51 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

January 16, 1976

Appeal from the Monroe County Court.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Witmer, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm the order of county court which affirmed the judgment of village court granting petitioner's request to recover real property in the possession of respondent pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law. The lease provided an option for the tenant to renew for two additional one-year terms upon giving the landlord at least 100 days' notice prior to the expiration of the original term of the lease. The tenant failed to give timely, definite, unequivocal and unqualified notice of his intention to renew. Absent waiver or special circumstances which warrant equitable relief, the right to renew is lost (Fidelity Columbia Trust Co. v Levin, 128 Misc. 838, affd 221 App. Div. 786, affd 248 N.Y. 551; Mico Mgt. Corp. v Scaraggi, 59 Misc.2d 984; 34 N.Y. Jur, Landlord and Tenant, § 419. Cf. Roys of North Syracuse v P C Food Markets, 51 A.D.2d 641).


Summaries of

Schoen v. Scudder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 16, 1976
51 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Schoen v. Scudder

Case Details

Full title:EARL E. SCHOEN, Respondent, v. SCOTT SCUDDER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Matter of Joyous v. Volkswagen of Oneonta

Respondent initially maintains that it effectively exercised the option to extend the lease for the…