From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Schneider

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Feb 20, 1996
916 S.W.2d 308 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 68133.

December 19, 1995. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 20, 1996.

APPEAL FROM ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MELVYN W. WEISMAN, JUDGE.

Howard Allen Witnner, Jane Carriker, Witnner, Poger, Rosenblum, Spewak, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.

Richard J. Eisen, Eisen, Gillespie Hilton, Robert C. O'Neal, Riezman Blitz, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.


ORDER

Appellants, Paul Schneider ("debtor") and Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum and Spewak, P.C. ("WPRS"), appeal from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, denying debtor's claim for a wage exemption and denying WPRS's claim of a prior secured interest in funds debtor was to receive under a noncompete agreement, and awarding the funds to respondents, Ivette Schneider ("wife") and Riezman and Blitz, P.C. ("garnishor"). We affirm.

We herein deny garnishor's motion to strike portions of the legal file or to dismiss.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the circuit court's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Schneider v. Schneider

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Feb 20, 1996
916 S.W.2d 308 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Schneider v. Schneider

Case Details

Full title:PAUL SCHNEIDER, APPELLANT, v. IVETTE SCHNEIDER, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Feb 20, 1996

Citations

916 S.W.2d 308 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)