From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Hardesty

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jun 23, 2009
Case Number: 1:06cv836 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 23, 2009)

Summary

allowing parties to conduct discovery on the question of personal jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Slay v. IB Travelin, Inc.

Opinion

Case Number: 1:06cv836.

June 23, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 5, 2009 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30) and Defendant Thomas Nelson filed a response to the objections (Doc. 34).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.

Accordingly, Defendant Thomas Nelson's motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schneider v. Hardesty

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jun 23, 2009
Case Number: 1:06cv836 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 23, 2009)

allowing parties to conduct discovery on the question of personal jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Slay v. IB Travelin, Inc.
Case details for

Schneider v. Hardesty

Case Details

Full title:DAVID M. SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff(s), v. MICHAEL HARDESTY, et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jun 23, 2009

Citations

Case Number: 1:06cv836 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 23, 2009)

Citing Cases

Slay v. IB Travelin, Inc.

The parties are to conduct discovery limited to the extent to which, if any, IB Travelin acted as an agent of…