From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Hardesty

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 14, 2010
Case Number: 1:06cv836 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 14, 2010)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:06cv836.

January 14, 2010


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan filed on December 4, 2009 (Doc. 47), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired December 24, 2009, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED and this Court certifies its June 23, 2009 Order as a final appealable order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. p. 54(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schneider v. Hardesty

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 14, 2010
Case Number: 1:06cv836 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Schneider v. Hardesty

Case Details

Full title:DAVID M. SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff(s), v. MICHAEL HARDESTY, et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jan 14, 2010

Citations

Case Number: 1:06cv836 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

Settle-Muter Elec., Ltd. v. Siemens Indus., Inc.

The Court's use of Rule 54(b) "should be reserved for the infrequent harsh case, . . . where certification…