From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmoll v. Acands Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 26, 1992
977 F.2d 499 (9th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

Nos. 89-35101, 89-35168.

Argued and Submitted September 15, 1992.

Decided October 26, 1992.

William N. Reed, H. Mitchell Cowan, J. Randall Patterson, Watkins Ludlam Stennis, Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

Henry Kantor, Jeffrey S. Mutnick, Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary Conboy, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon: Owen M. Panner, Chief Judge.

Before: BEEZER, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Under Oregon law, creditors have priority over shareholders in all of the future earnings of an insolvent corporation. We have reviewed the record in No. 89-35168 and we affirm the district court's judgment on the grounds stated in its opinion. Schmoll v. ACandS; Inc., 703 F. Supp. 868 (D.Or. 1988).

We dismiss Raytech's appeal of an interlocutory order in No. 89-35101.


Summaries of

Schmoll v. Acands Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 26, 1992
977 F.2d 499 (9th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

Schmoll v. Acands Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND A. SCHMOLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ACANDS, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 26, 1992

Citations

977 F.2d 499 (9th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

Raytech Corp. v. White

The remedy for a wrongly decided district court case from the District of Oregon is, of course, appeal to the…

In re Raytech Corp.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed on October 26, 1992. See Schmoll v. ACandS, supra, 977 F.2d 499. On March 10,…