From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SCHMITT v. VAG GROUP, INC.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Sep 21, 2010
Civil No. 09-380-HU (D. Or. Sep. 21, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-380-HU.

September 21, 2010

Michael K. Heilbronner, Idea Legal, PC, Portland, Oregon, Eli Mark, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello Bohrer, P.C., New York, New York, Attorneys for Plaintiff.


ORDER


The Honorable Dennis J. Hubel, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on August 12, 2010. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Hubel.

This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hubel (#36) dated August 12, 2010 in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (#29) is granted in part. Plaintiff is awarded $5,650.00 in fees and $515.65 in costs.

DATED this 21st day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

SCHMITT v. VAG GROUP, INC.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Sep 21, 2010
Civil No. 09-380-HU (D. Or. Sep. 21, 2010)
Case details for

SCHMITT v. VAG GROUP, INC.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SCHMITT dba Michael Schmitt Photography, an individual, Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-380-HU (D. Or. Sep. 21, 2010)