From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Standard Life Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 27, 2023
1:21-cv-01784-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2023)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01784-JLT-CDB

07-27-2023

JANICE SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Defendants.


ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION OF DANIEL A. SHMIKLER TO PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE (DOC. 59)

The Court has read and considered the application of Daniel A. Shmikler, attorney for Plaintiff Janice Schmidt, for admission to practice pro hac vice under the provisions of Local Rule 180(b)(2). (Doc. 59). Although Attorney Shmikler's application indicates it was submitted with a certificate of good standing, no such certificate was filed. (Id. p. 1). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Attorney Shmikler's application to appear pro hac vice is DENIED without prejudice subject to resubmittal with an attached certificate of good standing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schmidt v. Standard Life Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 27, 2023
1:21-cv-01784-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Schmidt v. Standard Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JANICE SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 27, 2023

Citations

1:21-cv-01784-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2023)