From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Pantry, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Apr 17, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11cv228-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Apr. 17, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11cv228-SPM/GRJ

04-17-2012

KARI L. SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. THE PANTRY, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 6, 2012 (doc. 35). The parties were afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 35) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (doc. 6) is denied.

_________________

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Schmidt v. Pantry, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Apr 17, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11cv228-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Apr. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Schmidt v. Pantry, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KARI L. SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. THE PANTRY, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 17, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11cv228-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Apr. 17, 2012)