From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Fehr

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Jun 19, 2014
851 N.W.2d 471 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2011AP1443.

2014-06-19

Cheryl A. SCHMIDT p/k/a Cheryl A. Sellers–Bruring, Plaintiff–Respondent–Cross–Appellant, v. Lee J. FEHR, Bryan E. Tillman, Fehr Law Office and Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants–Appellants–Cross–Respondents.

Id. at 130, 388 N.W.2d 908. Id., ¶ 18 n. 5. More broadly, public policy precludes imposing liability on the defendants where “it would shock the conscience of society to impose liability.” Bowen v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 183 Wis.2d 627, 656, 517 N.W.2d 432 (1994). Whether public policy precludes liability is a question of law subject to de novo review. Gritzner v. Michael R., 2000 WI 68, ¶ 27, 235 Wis.2d 781, 611 N.W.2d 906.



Summaries of

Schmidt v. Fehr

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Jun 19, 2014
851 N.W.2d 471 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Schmidt v. Fehr

Case Details

Full title:Cheryl A. SCHMIDT p/k/a Cheryl A. Sellers–Bruring…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Jun 19, 2014

Citations

851 N.W.2d 471 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
355 Wis. 2d 577
2014 WI App. 83

Citing Cases

Hussain v. Ascension Sacred Heart -- St. Mary's Hosp.

Tesar v. Anderson, 2010 WI App 116, ¶ 35, 329 Wis. 2d 240, 789 N.W.2d 351. See also Schmidt v. Fehr, 2014 WI…