From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Carrara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1960
11 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

July 5, 1960


In an action brought by an employee against his corporate employer and a fellow employee to recover damages for an assault committed by such fellow employee, the employer appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 26, 1958, denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to it (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion granted; and complaint dismissed as against the employer, defendant Lakeland Air Conditioning Sheet Metal Corp. In view of the outstanding award of compensation to plaintiff, and his acceptance of payments thereunder, he is precluded from bringing this action ( Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co., 280 App. Div. 940, affd. 305 N.Y. 648; Matter of Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co., 308 N.Y. 44; Pigott v. Field, 10 A.D.2d 99; Burgess v. Tryde Mfg. Co., 20 Misc.2d 875; see, also, Legault v. Brown, 283 App. Div. 303). Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Ughetta and Christ, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Schmidt v. Carrara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1960
11 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Schmidt v. Carrara

Case Details

Full title:HANS SCHMIDT, Respondent, v. PAUL CARRARA, Defendant, and LAKELAND AIR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Citing Cases

Werner v. State of New York

In holding defendant entitled to summary judgment in a common-law action by an employee against his employer,…

Estupinan v. Cleanerama Drive-In Cleaners, Inc.

The plaintiff cannot have both the benefits under the statute and damages at common law arising out of the…