From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmalenberger v. Town of Brookhaven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1967
28 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

May 1, 1967


Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 13, 1966, reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss the complaint denied. This is a negligence action against a town arising out of an alleged fall in a roadway in the hamlet of Centereach, Town of Brookhaven. The motion to dismiss and the order granting dismissal are erroneously premised on section 341-a of the Village Law, which is not applicable. The comparable Town Law provision is subdivision 1 of section 65-a, formerly section 215 High. of the Highway Law, and it differs from its Village Law counterpart in that actual notice or constructive notice is a sufficient condition precedent to a suit against a town with respect to a "defective, out of repair, unsafe, dangerous or obstructed" condition in "any highway, bridge or culvert". It must be noted that we are not construing those portions of subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 65-a dealing with snow and ice on a highway or with sidewalk conditions. Giving this complaint a fair and liberal reading as we must (CPLR 3026), we find a sufficient allegation of constructive notice which saves the complaint from attack on the ground asserted. Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Nolan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schmalenberger v. Town of Brookhaven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1967
28 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Schmalenberger v. Town of Brookhaven

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA SCHMALENBERGER et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Piscione v. County of Oneida

Plaintiff failed to establish that the town or county had prior written notice of the condition of the…