From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schley v. Lanier

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 26, 2022
SACV 22-01732-JWH(JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)

Opinion

SACV 22-01732-JWH(JDEx)

10-26-2022

Earleen Schley, et al. v. Jonathan Lanier, et al.


CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

JOHN W. HOLCOMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Generally, each Defendant must answer or otherwise respond to the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the Defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a)(1).

This case was removed from Superior Court for the County of Orange to this Court on September 22, 2022. Plaintiffs have not filed an answer or otherwise responded to the complaint. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Defendant to show cause in writing on or before November 9, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to each Plaintiff who has not filed an answer or otherwise responded to the complaint. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. This Order to Show Cause will be discharged if the Defendant files, before the deadline set forth above, a request for the entry of default with respect to the applicable Defendant(s). Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 55(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schley v. Lanier

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 26, 2022
SACV 22-01732-JWH(JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Schley v. Lanier

Case Details

Full title:Earleen Schley, et al. v. Jonathan Lanier, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 26, 2022

Citations

SACV 22-01732-JWH(JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)