From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schlarb v. Hartwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 22, 1935
196 N.E. 273 (Ohio 1935)

Opinion

No. 24814

Decided May 22, 1935.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — No bill of exceptions — Cause heard by Court of Appeals on appeal — Engrafting parol trust on deed.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Mahoning county.

Mr. John Schlarb and Mr. W.W. Zimmerman, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. James G. Hartwell and Mr. Clyde W. Osborne, for defendants in error.


It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that this cause was heard by the Court of Appeals on appeal and no bill of exceptions was presented to and allowed by the Court of Appeals. Section 11566, General Code. ( Hill v. Bassett, 27 Ohio St. 597; Detroit, Toledo Ironton Rd. Co. v. Blaum, 120 Ohio St. 612, 169 N.E. 297; and Micklethwait v. City of Portsmouth, 110 Ohio St. 514, 144 N.E. 274.)

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schlarb v. Hartwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 22, 1935
196 N.E. 273 (Ohio 1935)
Case details for

Schlarb v. Hartwell

Case Details

Full title:SCHLARB, EXR., ET AL. v. HARTWELL, ADMR., ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 22, 1935

Citations

196 N.E. 273 (Ohio 1935)
196 N.E. 273

Citing Cases

Knowlson v. Bellman

Since neither of these is present, the only course left to this court is to affirm the decree of the Court of…

In re Lee Way Holding Co.

Within that classification, implied trusts are categorized as either resulting or constructive. Hartwell v.…