Opinion
No. 2487.
January 26, 1931.
Chas. E. Townsend, Wm. A. Loftus, and Thos. G. Goulden, all of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.
Chas. M. Fryer and Alfred C. Aurich both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.
In Equity. Suit by the Schlage Lock Company against the Pratt-Rymer Company and others. On defendants' objections to complainant's interrogatories.
Objections overruled in part and sustained in part.
Defendants have interposed objections to complainant's interrogatories on the ground that the bill of complaint seeks treble damages under the statutory provision, invoking the rule of practice promulgated by this court in the case of Paraffine Cos., Inc., v. Wieland, 17 F.2d 992, 996, where Judge Kerrigan held, with my approval, "that a party will not be required to answer interrogatories which might result in a penalty through imposition of treble damages."
In making this rule, we accepted the reasoning in Wilson v. Union Tool Co. (D.C.) 275 F. 624. But upon further consideration Judge Kerrigan and I are of the opinion that the better view on this question is expressed in Perkins Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Owen (D.C.) 293 F. 759, which favors a liberal interpretation of Equity Rule 58 (28 USCA § 723) and sections 4919 and 4921, Revised Statutes (35 USCA §§ 67, 70), and is supported by the weight of authority.
In accordance with such interpretation, it is ordered that the objections to interrogatories Nos. 1 to 8, inclusive, be, and the same are hereby, overruled, and that the objections to interrogatories Nos. 9 and 10 be, and they are hereby, sustained.