Opinion
18 CIVIL 2352 (VEC)
02-11-2020
CHRISTOPHER SCHIRO, individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CEMEX, S.A.B. DE C.V., CEMEX LATAM HOLDINGS, S.A., FERNANDO A. GONZALEZ OLIVIERI, and JOSE ANTONIO GONZALEZ FLORES, Defendants.
JUDGMENT
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 10, 2020, Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted; the court warned the Plaintiffs in its prior opinion that if it granted a motion to dismissed the Second Amended Complaint, it would not grant further leave to amend unless Plaintiffs "provided a detailed indication of what facts they would add to cure the pleading's defects (and, ideally a redline proposed Third Amended Complaint) with an explanation of why the amendment would not be futile.: accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice and, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York
February 11, 2020
RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerk of Court
BY: /s/ _________
Deputy Clerk