Opinion
23-1398
07-28-2023
GRAHAM SCHIFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADA E. CLARK-EDWARDS; TODD STEUART; KATHERINE TRENHOLM GETTY, Defendants-Appellees.
Graham Harry Schiff, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: July 25, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen Lipton Hollander, Senior District Judge. (1:23-cv-00822-ELH)
Graham Harry Schiff, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Graham Harry Schiff appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Schiff filed his complaint in March 2023 raising claims for conduct that occurred in July 2019. Because Schiff knew of the alleged injury arising from the conduct when it occurred in 2019, his § 1983 claims were time-barred. Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-101 (2022); Nat'l Advert. Co. v. City of Raleigh, 947 F.2d 1158, 1161-62 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Schiff v. Clark-Edwards, No. 1:23-cv-00822-ELH (D. Md. Apr. 11, 2023); see Earle v. Schreves, 990 F.3d 774, 781 n.3 (4th Cir. 2021) (recognizing that we may "affirm a judgment for any reason appearing on the record"). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED