From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schieffelin v. Hylan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1919
125 N.E. 925 (N.Y. 1919)

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1919

Decided October 21, 1919

William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel ( John F. O'Brien and John Lehman of counsel), for appellants.

Leonard M. Wallstein for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in negative. Third, fourth and seventh questions answered in affirmative. Fifth question answered in negative. The public service commission has made no sufficient requisition. Second and sixth questions not answered; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Absent: HOGAN, J.


Summaries of

Schieffelin v. Hylan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1919
125 N.E. 925 (N.Y. 1919)
Case details for

Schieffelin v. Hylan

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. SCHIEFFELIN, Respondent, v . JOHN F. HYLAN et al., Constituting…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 21, 1919

Citations

125 N.E. 925 (N.Y. 1919)
125 N.E. 925

Citing Cases

Wilmerding v. Laguardia

The worst that can happen to the plaintiff is that in subsequent years she may be obliged to pay higher real…

Stahl Soap Corp. v. City of New York

The charge of the plaintiff is that there was a total lack of power in the city to close the street since it…