From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schiedenhelm v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Aug 31, 2018
255 So. 3d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5D17-3504

08-31-2018

Jeromy Stephen SCHIEDENHELM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jeromy Stephen Schiedenhelm, Live Oak, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Jeromy Stephen Schiedenhelm, Live Oak, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jeromy Schiedenhelm, appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, where he raised eight claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because Appellant filed a legally and facially sufficient claim in ground six, and the attachments do not conclusively refute the claim, we reverse the summary denial of ground six and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for the court to attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim. See Cioeta v. State, 204 So.3d 156 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, TORPY, and WALLIS JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schiedenhelm v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Aug 31, 2018
255 So. 3d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Schiedenhelm v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEROMY STEPHEN SCHIEDENHELM, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 31, 2018

Citations

255 So. 3d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)