From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schicke v. Lynn

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 20, 1974
507 F.2d 1389 (2d Cir. 1974)

Opinion

No. 198, Docket 74-1690.

Argued November 21, 1974.

Decided December 20, 1974.

John Keogh, Jr., Norwalk, Conn. (John A. Mottalini, Keogh, Candee Burkhart, Norwalk, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Karen K. Siegel, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Stewart H. Jones, U.S. Atty., for the District of Connecticut, Hartford, Conn., Carla A. Hills, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City, Stephen F. Eilperin, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Federal defendants-appellees.

Arthur J. Goldblatt, Corp. Counsel, Norwalk, Conn., for defendant-appellee City of Norwalk.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut.

Before SMITH, HAYS and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.


The order of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge Blumenfeld's well-reasoned opinion, see 386 F.Supp. 97 (D.Conn. 1974).


Summaries of

Schicke v. Lynn

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 20, 1974
507 F.2d 1389 (2d Cir. 1974)
Case details for

Schicke v. Lynn

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. SCHICKE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JAMES T. LYNN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 20, 1974

Citations

507 F.2d 1389 (2d Cir. 1974)

Citing Cases

Sneaker Circus, Inc. v. Carter

First, in his proclamation announcing the consummation of the OMAs, the President specifically stated that he…

Philadelphia Council of Neighborhood v. Coleman

474 F.2d at 319. Upon remand, the Federal defendant, HUD, submitted two affidavits which were held to remedy…