From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schertz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 1, 1980
387 So. 2d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 78-186.

August 20, 1980. Rehearing Denied October 1, 1980.

Appeal from the Palm Beach County Circuit Court, Marvin U. Mounts, Jr., J.

Richard L. Joranby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stewart J. Bellus, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The appellant was originally placed on probation for a term of five years, the maximum period allowable for the offense involved. After finding that the appellant had violated the terms of his probation the trial court continued the appellant on probation but added an extra year to the term of probation. The extra year exceeded the maximum legal term by one year. Heatherly v. State, 343 So.2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Accordingly, the order of probation is reversed with directions that the provision for serving the extra year on probation be stricken. The order is in all other respects affirmed.

LETTS, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schertz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 1, 1980
387 So. 2d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Schertz v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE K. SCHERTZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 1, 1980

Citations

387 So. 2d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Summers v. State

There is no dispute that if a trial court, upon a finding that a violation of probation has occurred, decides…

Straughan v. State

Our courts have similarly ruled that, where a trial court, after having adjudicated a defendant guilty for…