From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schechter v. Viking Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 1, 2022
8:20-cv-02155-JLS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2022)

Opinion

8:20-cv-02155-JLS-DFM

03-01-2022

Jack Schechter v. Viking Group, Inc. et al


PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 3, 2021, a Mediation Report was filed in this case indicating that the case has been completely settled. (See Mediation Report, Doc. 17.) Plaintiff subsequently filed a Notice of Dismissal. (See Notice of Dismissal, Doc. 18.) That document was stricken, however, because an Answer had been filed in the case, and therefore, any notice of dismissal was required to be signed by all parties who had appeared in the action. (See Order, Doc. 20.) The Court ordered the Parties to file an amended or corrected document by September 30, 2021, but the Parties failed to do so. In light of the fact the Parties have completely settled, Plaintiff has attempted to dismiss the case, and the Parties have failed to file the requested notice of dismissal, the Court DISMISSES the case with prejudice.


Summaries of

Schechter v. Viking Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 1, 2022
8:20-cv-02155-JLS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Schechter v. Viking Grp.

Case Details

Full title:Jack Schechter v. Viking Group, Inc. et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 1, 2022

Citations

8:20-cv-02155-JLS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2022)