From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schar v. Hartford Life Insurance Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 24, 2003
No. C 02-1073 JL (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2003)

Opinion

No. C 02-1073 JL

January 24, 2003


CORRECTION


There is a typographical error in this court's Summary Judgment order, filed January 23, 2003. At page 13, lines 19-22, is the following:

"Plaintiff attempts to distinguish "foreseeable" from "foreseen," to show that, while Dr. Knight anticipated an embolism of some kind, making an embolism per se foreseeable, he did not anticipate a fatal embolism, so if Mr. Schar's death resulted from such an embolism it was not foreseen, and therefore not an accident."

The last line should read "it was not foreseen, and therefore was an accident."

The order is hereby corrected.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schar v. Hartford Life Insurance Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 24, 2003
No. C 02-1073 JL (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2003)
Case details for

Schar v. Hartford Life Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:LOLITA SCHAR, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 24, 2003

Citations

No. C 02-1073 JL (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2003)