From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schallert v. Mercy Hospital of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 21, 2001.

Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, O'Donnell, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., WISNER, HURLBUTT AND BURNS, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following

Memorandum:

Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Shirley Schallert (plaintiff) as a result of her fall from an operating table while she was under general anesthesia and in the care of defendants. Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiffs' motion seeking partial summary judgment on liability against defendants Mercy Hospital of Buffalo, the employer of the two operating room nurses, and Mark S. St. Marie, M.D., the surgeon, and properly denied the cross motion of St. Marie for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him. As a matter of law, the surgeon and nurses were negligent in failing to secure the unconscious patient adequately in order to prevent her from falling from the operating table.

We conclude, however, that the court erred in granting that part of plaintiffs' motion seeking partial summary judgment on liability against defendant George Bancroft, M.D., the anesthesiologist, and in denying the cross motion of Bancroft for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him, and we modify the order accordingly. Bancroft and his expert averred, and plaintiffs failed to controvert, that Bancroft's role as anesthesiologist was limited to administering anesthesia to plaintiff, monitoring her vital signs and managing her airway; that Bancroft had no responsibility to secure plaintiff to the operating table and did not in fact participate in placing any such restraints on her; and that the responsibility for properly positioning and securing the patient belonged solely to the surgeon and nurses. Bancroft thus established as a matter of law that he breached no duty of care to plaintiff ( see generally, Tenuto v. Lederle Labs., 90 N.Y.2d 606, 612; De Angelis v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., 58 N.Y.2d 1053, 1055).


Summaries of

Schallert v. Mercy Hospital of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Schallert v. Mercy Hospital of Buffalo

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEY SCHALLERT AND JOSEPH SCHALLERT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MERCY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 668

Citing Cases

Martingano v. Walter A. Hall, M.D.

Radiology Associates met their initial burden on the cross motion, and plaintiff failed to raise a triable…

Looby v. Saratoga Hosp.

The key factual issues are (1) where nurse O'Brien was positioned when the incident took place and (2) even…