Opinion
No. ED 108376
09-15-2020
Emil G. SCHAGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Samuel E. Buffaloe, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg. 7, Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Movant/Appellant. Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.
Samuel E. Buffaloe, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg. 7, Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Movant/Appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.
Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Emil G. Schager ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object during the State's closing argument. Finding that the motion court did not err, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).