Opinion
(6184)
Argued June 16, 1988
Decision released June 30, 1988
Action for the dissolution of a marriage, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Danbury, geographical area number three, and tried to the court, W. Sullivan, J.; judgment dissolving the marriage and granting certain other relief; thereafter, the court denied the plaintiff's motion for contempt and the defendant's motion for modification of the alimony award and to defer the sale of the marital home, and the defendant appealed to this court. No error.
Tony Ghecas, for the appellant (defendant).
Charles F. Stelljes, for the appellee (plaintiff).
We have carefully examined the records, transcripts and briefs submitted to us on this appeal. After affording the plaintiff's claims of error the appropriate scope of review, to the extent that they have been properly presented, we conclude that the trial court correctly applied the law to the evidence. We cannot retry the case. Stiepel v. Cone, 14 Conn. App. 815, 541 A.2d 547 (1988).