From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jul 22, 2013
SCPW-13-0002165 (Haw. Jul. 22, 2013)

Opinion

SCPW-13-0002165

07-22-2013

STEVEN R. SCHAEFER, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the June 22, 2013 letter from Steven R. Schaefer, it appears that Mr. Schaefer is seeking review of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel's consideration of the complaint Mr. Schaefer filed against attorneys Hayden Aluli and Mimi Desjardins. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall file the June 22, 2013 letter as a petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 22, 2013.

Mark E. Recktenwald

Paula A. Nakayama

Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Sabrina S. McKenna

Richard W. Pollack


Summaries of

Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jul 22, 2013
SCPW-13-0002165 (Haw. Jul. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN R. SCHAEFER, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Jul 22, 2013

Citations

SCPW-13-0002165 (Haw. Jul. 22, 2013)