Opinion
No. 1826.
Submitted March 8, 1926.
Decided April 5, 1926.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
This interference involves the same applications of the parties Scalione and Heimann that were involved in Patent Appeal No. 1824, ___ App. D.C. ___, 12 F.2d 171, just decided. Heimann relies upon his German application, as did the party Bosch in patent appeal No. 1824. Since the rulings in that case are applicable here, the facts being substantially the same, the decision is affirmed.
Affirmed.