Opinion
No. 1825.
Submitted March 8, 1926.
Decided April 5, 1926.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
This interference involves the same applications of the parties Scalione and Bosch that were involved in the prior interference, patent appeal No. 1824, ___ App. D.C. ___, 12 F.2d 171, just decided, and the same contentions are made. It follows that the rulings made in that case are controlling here, and accordingly the decision is affirmed.
Affirmed.